New Jersey Again...

The skip may not have been in the house at the time of the search, but, obviously the couple in question did obstruct justice, harbour, and aid and abett a wanted felonious fugitive.

Because of the agent's perseverance they were able to capture the fugitive the next morning through surveillance of 1 of the residents of the house. I think this point got overlooked by everyone.

Why aren't the couple in question being charged and arrested for these charges ?

_________________
River City Associates
Decatur, Al. 35601

Good observation Ruffin.

_________________
-The Solution-
Indiana Agency #: PI20700211
Indiana Notary Public - Exp: 12/20/13

"Be without fear in the face of your enemies. Be brave and upright that God may love thee. Speak the truth always, even if it leads to your death. Safeguard the helpless and do no wrong. That is your oath."
- Kingdom of Heaven

Ruffin;

Yes, good point. Here is the kicker (in my opinion). I read a 2nd article today where the local police stated they had no comment or opinion regarding this case. The reason being (from what I read) is because they were not involved in any way.

Not for 1 moment do I believe the Recovery Agents stole the rent money or jewerly. I do believe they maced the family pit bull, because I sure as heck would have. I believe these individuals are making these claims because they "were" harboring a fugitive.

As for the individuals being arrested for harboring a fugitive, they will not be. From what has been reported, the police were never involved. These individuals can (and do everyday) lie to us <recovery agents> and nothing will happen, because we are not law enforcement. But, lie to law enforcement (local, state of fed) and watch what can happen.

_________________
Steve Hedrick
Hedrick & Associates INVESTIGATIVE GROUP
Nederland, TX
TX PI LIC #A-09665
(409) 284-1895
http://360.yahoo.com/ftachaser357
"For every DEFENDANT that fails to appear in Court, there is a VICTIM seeking Justice"

Here is the start of the regulation process expected in N J . They are still vague in structure with the exception of "money", which if i remember correctly is what we save the taxpayers with our service. They also stipulate in this early phase that ""( a bounty hunter wouldn't confer a right to carry a weapon. A bounty hunter would have to comply with state firearms laws to carry a weapon)"". I wonder if we would have a right to sue the state or judge who denies us the right to protect ourselves and others in the course of doing our job. Our judge in Bergen County who denies ccw licenses say's "find another occupation", and thats to owners of bailbond company's.

Your input would be invited and appreciated.


http://www.nj.com/statehouse/times/inde ... xml&coll=5

AGAIN POOR TACTICAL DECISIONS WERE MADE--DOOR SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN KICKED BEA SHOULD HAVE WAITED FOR PEOPLE TO EITHER RETURN HOME OR LEAVE HOME THE NEXT MORNING--AGAIN I SAY POOR TACTICAL TRAINING AND POOR STREET SENSE--NJ IS DROWNING IN FUGITIVE SCUM THESE DAYS TURN THIS PROBLEM INTO A POSITIVE BY GOING TO THE PEOPLE EITHER THROUGH TV OR OTHER MEDIA SOURCES--GET THE VOTING PEOPLE ON YOUR SIDE ALL YOU NJ AGENTS NEED TO GET TOGETHER WITH ONE VOICE AND MOVE THE PEOPLE TO YOUR SIDE

I KNOW SOMETIMES I SOUND LIKE A BROKEN RECORD BUT WITH OUT SOME VICTORIES WE WILL SLIP AWAY SLOWLY IN TO THE DARK NIGHT LIKE A SINKING SHIP\

DO NOT COMPLAIN JUST FIX THE PROBLEM BY DOING OR ELSE GIVE UP AND FORGET BEA