Chapman Charged With Lawsuit .... • PUBLIC SECTION • Media Coverage • Fugitive Recovery Network (FRN) Forums
FRN Banner
wordpress-ad





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
 
Author Message
 Post subject: Chapman Charged With Lawsuit ....
 Post Posted: Thu 17 Aug 2006 18:28 
Offline
Advanced Poster
Advanced Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun 16 Jan 2005 11:40
Posts: 966
Location: New Jersey
FRN Agency ID #: 1208
Experience: More than 10 years
http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/view.php?S ... 3526-3526r


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Thu 17 Aug 2006 18:39 
Offline
Advanced Poster
Advanced Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu 09 Mar 2006 14:51
Posts: 3344
FRN Agency ID #: 3904
Experience: More than 10 years
Here's the SF Chronicle Article:

Duane 'Dog' Chapman Faces Calif. Suit
-
Thursday, August 17, 2006


(08-17) 17:38 PDT San Francisco (AP) --


Television bounty hunter Duane "Dog" Chapman, who spends most of his days tracking fugitives who skip court appearances, might have to make a few court appearances of his own.


A lawsuit filed by a Daly City man in U.S. District Court on Wednesday seeks unspecified damages from Chapman and his Hawaii-based group of bondsman, the A&E television network and police.


The suit filed by Simaile "Cisco" Lutu, 29, claims the group wrongly tried to apprehend him when trying to snare a bail jumper who played for the Daly City Renegades semipro football team. He said police then continued to target him.


"This is reality TV run amok," said Lutu's attorney, Jim Hammer, also a television legal commentator.


The lawsuit claims the incident began when Chapman's son tried to grab and restrain Lutu, thinking he was suspected drug dealer Samu Savea. The elder Chapman conceded that Lutu wasn't his fugitive.

Chapmans son tried to grab and restrain one of the players, but it wasn't the fugitive - who wasn't even at the team practice on May 24, 2005. It was Daly City nightclub promoter Simaile " Cisco" Lutu, 29, whose mood quickly soured.

"Hey What are you doing?" the 6 foot 5 Lutu said on film, easily pushing away Leland Chapman, who is much smaller. Lutu added "Y all about to see Dog f---up."

The elder Chapman conceded that Lutu wasn't his fugutive from Hawaii, a 6 foot tall suspected drug dealer named Samu Savea, and left saying, " Be safe."



The lawsuit says the following day Daly City police, who were working with Chapman, handcuffed Lutu and held him at gunpoint at a health club. The lawsuit charges that Lutu was later handcuffed and held at gunpoint again by Daly City officers in a second incident.

While neither of those incidents was aired, the encounter at the Daly City practice field was featured on this year's season premiere - even though Lutu refused to sign a release for the use of his image, the lawsuit says.

When people intimidate and harass other people just to make money, it's outrageous," Hammer added. "We suspect this has been going on for some time and we intend to find out how often."



Chapman, 53, told the San Francisco Chronicle that he was surprised by the lawsuit. "Cisco called me right after the show and said, 'Thanks Dog, all the girls love me now,'" Chapman said.


The lawsuit also claims that Lutu refused to sign a release for the use of his image but that the episode featuring his encounter with "Dog" still aired on this year's season premiere.

Chapman said he was not present when Lutu was allegedly detained by police at the gym and the nightclub. And he said he was not involved in the decision to air the park scene.

"All I do is bounty hunt," he said.

His wife, Beth Chapman, questioned Lutu's motives and suggested that he was not an innocent party during the hunt for Savea. "Today, he decides he's mad?" she asked. "When should you be mad, brother,? I see that as opportunistic."

A second plaintiff, whom Chapman questioned abourt Savea on camera in South San Francisco, claims his appearance on the episode damaged his reputation.

On the show, Chalman first flew to the Bay Area after gettinga tip that Savea played for the Renegades. He called the suspect, who had eluded him for three years, " the thorn in my flesh."

He appeared to catch Savea in Pacifica after a few days, but in fact, the lawsuit states, he returned to California to make the capture two months later.

When handcuffed on camera, Savea seemed surprised by all of the attention. "It not like I shot somebody," he said.

Nearbay, Beth Chapman broke into tears.

"Call the judge," she shouted into a cell phone.


Chapman became famous in 2003 for capturing convicted rapist and Max Factor heir Andrew Luster.


___
The text in italics was added in from the actual San Francisco newspaper article. The online version is in regular text.

Information from: San Francisco Chronicle,


www.sfgate.com/chronicle





Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Thu 31 Aug 2006 10:17 
 
Yea, Unfortunately, The A&E crew's film was rolling, "DoG's" son did grab a guys hand but the dude jerked his hand away and that was the end of it.
Then they guy was posing for the camera"He enjoyed the camera presense"
Then when they did arrest the real guy, The coach was with him, And jus the day b4, Said he hasnt seen him.
Not to mention he had task force with him(who also arrested the coach) for
harboring a fugitive.
The guy in question was never detained, Cuffed, or put in a vehicle.
Isnt illegal to grab at someones hand.Good thing camera was rolling, Now DoG, A&E nor anyone will have anything done legally to them, Im sure the idiot will drop charges once the video is seen.


Top 
  
 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Thu 31 Aug 2006 11:02 
Offline
in memoriam
User avatar

Joined: Tue 24 May 2005 14:46
Posts: 3334
Location: Colorado
FRN Agency ID #: 324
Experience: 5 - 7 years
The guy is suing for defamation of character after they showed him on TV, supposedly without his permission. This is a civil, not criminal action.

_________________
Kathy Blackshear
Blackshear Investigations
Blackshear Bail Bonds
Sales Associate, Prepaid Legal Services, Inc.
Walsenburg, CO


Proud Member of the AB Reject Club


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Thu 31 Aug 2006 12:04 
Offline
Advanced Poster
Advanced Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu 09 Mar 2006 14:51
Posts: 3344
FRN Agency ID #: 3904
Experience: More than 10 years
California Penal Code:

242. A battery is any willful and unlawful use of force or violence upon the person of another.

It is illegal to grab someones hand

Since he was the wrong person, the attempted arrest was unlawful. Dogs crew are not LEO they are not immune from criminal or civil prosecution for a false arrest or attempt of false arrest.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: arrest
 Post Posted: Thu 31 Aug 2006 12:26 
Offline
in memoriam

Joined: Sun 30 Mar 2003 19:43
Posts: 774
in most states just the touch of another is considered battery--as tony said beas are not leo and can not detain for investigation as leo can

next thing is i believe the publicity all over ca will impede cooperation between leo and beas--this will most likely be settled out of court for an undisclosed sum of greenbacks--funny thing is there are marked differences between cisco and samu--a good quailty pic should have shown that


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Hey
 Post Posted: Thu 31 Aug 2006 12:34 
Offline
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster

Joined: Thu 10 Mar 2005 10:20
Posts: 76
Location: Lancaster, Pennsylvania
It's just another jack@$$ trying to get a quick buck so his lazy @$$ doesn't have to work. I get tired of hearing about these types of people. I read a few weeks ago that a lady sued a RV company for 1.5 million dollars and for a new RV because she thought cruise control meant the car drives itself and the company didn't explain that in the manul. After she put it on cruise control she went to make a sandwich and got in an accident. People are ridiculous these days.

Adam Groff
NSIN #AG0305


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Thu 31 Aug 2006 13:33 
Offline
Advanced Poster
Advanced Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun 16 Jan 2005 11:40
Posts: 966
Location: New Jersey
FRN Agency ID #: 1208
Experience: More than 10 years
After this suit is finally settled for whatever undisclosed amount, the general public are more aware as to the laws and will be more prone to "sue" at a faster drop of the hat.
This incident will only magnify a pre existing consequence we all may face at any time, and also keep the lawyers smiling.


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

FRN Forums » PUBLIC SECTION » Media Coverage


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 145 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Fugitive Recovery Network

FRN Forum
Login
Forum
Register
Forum FAQ


Advertise on FRN



ad_here_1