Proposed Legislation in CT • PUBLIC SECTION • Media Coverage • Fugitive Recovery Network (FRN) Forums
FRN Banner
wordpress-ad





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
 
Author Message
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Tue 25 Mar 2008 16:20 
Offline
Advanced Poster
Advanced Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu 23 Nov 2006 18:44
Posts: 1311
Location: San Ramon, CA
FRN Agency ID #: 1366
Experience: 7 - 10 years
The whole deal with posting the $10,000 won't pass. Also, the State wants to put the premiums at 10% across the board. The people doing the undercutting will do themselves in..the DOI doesn't do jack in response to complaints..it's always "get me more proof" I submitted signed statements and they still wanted more...give it to DPS..they can do better then the DOI anyday.. This has gone on for years and its always the same old story...

_________________
Kate
650.863.8470

" Yeah, I see ya, you ding dong..."


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Wed 26 Mar 2008 14:56 
Offline
Posting Newbie
Posting Newbie

Joined: Mon 24 Mar 2008 18:55
Posts: 3
Location: Hartford
RESPECTFULLY-- The DPS cant even police themselves, let alone have MORE responsiblities. When Detectives from the DPS made some arrests in the bond industry a couple of years ago, one the the Detectives was a trooper targeted in the "whos policing the state police" stories in the news. He was let go twice for drunk driving by his "own." For the record, I have been a bondsman for quite awhile and DO believe that some specific change is neccesary. The change that people like Mary Casey and Doug Davenport want is to suit their own inability to adapt to a growing industry. An industry, by the way, that CT has ALLOWED to grow out of control. I WISH they would pass the $10,000 per bondsman element of the bill. That part of it would get rid of half the bondsman in Connecticut. Have CT stop allowing MORE bondsman to be licensed. Like liquor licensing, only so many per town, or in this case, CT. If people CAN do payment plans, MANDATE a minimum of 50% down and let us revoke for nonpayment of those premiums. If you dont pay your car insurance bill, you DONT have car insurance. I believe there are over 17,000 legitimate beds for inmates in CT and over 19000 inmates. Disallow payment plans and I cannot possibly imagine what the increase will be. People, more often than not, cannot afford a full fee bond. Make the right changes and then police them accordingly. Dont let people like Ive spoke of, have secret meetings like they know they do EVERY year with DOI and the legislature, and make unrealistic changes just so that THEY TOO can put more money in there pockets. And by the way, the people steam rolling these reformations, know full well that they do bonds for flat fees and discounts. Make no mistake.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Wed 26 Mar 2008 15:01 
Offline
Posting Newbie
Posting Newbie

Joined: Mon 24 Mar 2008 18:55
Posts: 3
Location: Hartford
"Scott", you are dead on 150% right with regard to the premiums being sent to the insurance companies. Makes NO sense.


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

FRN Forums » PUBLIC SECTION » Media Coverage


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 113 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Fugitive Recovery Network

FRN Forum
Login
Forum
Register
Forum FAQ


Advertise on FRN



ad_here_1




wordpress-ad