Obama Admin. Going After AZ Regarding Gun Control • PUBLIC SECTION • Open Discussion • Fugitive Recovery Network (FRN) Forums
FRN Banner
wordpress-ad





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
 
Author Message
 Post subject: Obama Admin. Going After AZ Regarding Gun Control
 Post Posted: Fri 23 Sep 2011 10:13 
Offline
Junior Poster
Junior Poster

Joined: Mon 19 Sep 2011 10:34
Posts: 35
FRN Agency ID #: 0
Experience: More than 10 years
I don't know if many of you have heard what the Obama Admin. is trying to do with regards to 1.4 million acres/ 486,000 being within the Sonoran Desert National Monument. Through BLM he's trying to make it off limits for shooters or hunters. Plain terms, gun control. If you or someone you know may be interested, see the following:

SEE: www/azcdl.org

Julia

_________________
Julia D'Alfonzo
AZ Lic # 1525946
Lien & Bond Investigative Services
AZ Lic # 1002269
ArizonaPIs.com


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Obama Admin. Going After AZ Regarding Gun Control
 Post Posted: Fri 23 Sep 2011 11:07 
 
Sonoran Desert National Monument is not too far West from my former home of 15+ years (Casa Grande, Maricopa, etc). The area is not part of any city, it's out in Pinal County just north of Gila Bend where gun laws are more lax than city laws. It's also not far from the Gila Bend checkpoint, where US Border Patrol check and detain a large portion of illegal immigrants and drug smugglers from Mexico. For those who aren't familiar with AZ laws, it's a crime to shoot a saguaro cactus, they're protected. In fact, you need a special permit to move it, and a licensed moving company has to do it. Anyway, morons out here get drunk and shoot at stuff all the time, and cactus are indifferent to them. SDNM has the Saguaro forest, and since it takes over 50-100 years for one to grow to normal size, I can see why they want to protect the area. Plus it's the home of numerous endangered animals. Unless it's a national park anyone can bring a firearm (concealed or otherwise) into the area, but discharging the firearm would be illegal. I'm unsure of the location's status (national park, national forest, etc). It could be interpreted as gun control, but honestly in this case and for this habitat IMHO it's necessary. This coming from someone who wears his concealed Taurus PT-140 Millenium Pro all the time (even to church). Old habits are hard to break. :wink:


Top 
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

FRN Forums » PUBLIC SECTION » Open Discussion


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Fugitive Recovery Network

FRN Forum
Login
Forum
Register
Forum FAQ


Advertise on FRN



directory




smoke-shop