Don't really want to lose respect from Scott M. or those out there that don't use badges/ agent on clothing.. etc.
But... I really think it depends on where you operate. Think about this for a minute. Plainclothes PD or any LE operating like this either local, state or federal always seems to dress the same. Unless their homocide or "white color" investigators, plain clothes guys who do apprehensions usually wear jeans, plain shirt, badge on belt or neckchain, gun on side, bp vest sometimes under another t-shirt, sometimes not. The point is they all look the same. You can spot them in an instant if you see them anywhere. PD does not have a monopoly on "the look of a plain clothes operator". BDU's, vests and other items were actually started in the military and in the grand timeline of history only recently came on the scene with PD starting with LAPD Swat.
Why is it that they all look the same? There is no "official plain clothes dress code" at our dept. So then why?
Because it seems to be the most efficient way to dress and operate.
Jeans are durable, they blend in well and don't attract attention.
A badge on a neckchain provides a hidden identification piece that remains out of view, but when needed can be produced very quickly.
This is a bit of a double edged sword since BEA's are sometimes unlicensed and unforturnately untrained. I wish to come home to my wife and kids just like any LEO/BEA/Security Guard/Repo Man etc does. Do LEO's have any "more" right to safety and convenience than BEA's do?
Its sad that if ANY LEO wears the "plain clothes" traditional garb to make his job easier he is considered "dressing the role". If a BEA does it, he is trying to "copy" an LEO.
Why does Federal LE wear "Agent" on clothing to arrest someone or serve a warrant? They have ID in their pockets, they don't really "NEED" to have Agent on any clothing. They can just SAY what they are there for.
And if local PD does a raid or serves a warrant why do they need "POLICE" on their shirts? Wouldn't it be obvious? What purpose does the lettering really have? And the neckbadge... why would they display it? Do they NEED IT TO to effect a proper apprehension? And are they considered to be "copying the Feds, or military?" since they didn't start the look.
In truth, the lettering and badge keeps them safe. People are primarily a Visual animal first. When they see a badge, lettering etc... they think "something official" Now whether they think you are LE, Feds, Army, SAS... who knows! As long as they don't think you are a local gang banger trying to rob this fugitive of his stash.
That is why PD goes in all lettered up, not to show off, but for safety. So doesn't it seem a little funny to say that if we need to enter a house and apprehend an individual that we shouldn't be entitled to that level of safety because "other groups" do it and we might be trying to look like them?
For the record, as I stated in my earlier posts, I am a Reserve LE for two different dept's in Michigan so I have PD clothing, badge, etc. I have no interest in "playing cop" while working as a BEA, but the nature of apprehending criminals has many ways to do it. If wearing a neckbadge, lettering, etc lets me do it with more safety and efficiency, then why wouldn't I?
Think about this... in Mich, a parole agent, or probation agent, is NOT a LEO, has no LEO powers whatsoever. Yet if they go after one of their absconders or fugitives they dress in "Agent" garb etc. Yet they are not with the FBI, etc. They just have to return their skip, the same as BEA's.
But because they are not BEA's they are not ridiculed and never questioned about their garb or use of the word Agent.
On the flip side.... I see their argument... I really do. If some yoyo watches cops or dog the bh, and his uncle is a bondsman. He may think it is "cool" to dress the role and play his private little version of cops and robbers.
Finally I do think location plays a big part. Around here, you would really not want to enter a home with no "official looking" garb. It would be very dangerous! I have heard the statement: "as long as a reasonable person does not believe you are LE" pertaining to dress/ badges etc.
Well I gotta tell you, If you go into someones home with NO BADGE, just jeans and a polo shirt, NO LETTERING, NO GUN, NOTHING. And the neighbor sees you take out a person in handcuffs, place him in your vehicle, and drive off. He isn't going to think they are making a movie in his neighborhood. He is probably going to think you are LE or something similar. In other words, when you apprehend someone and people see it, they are going to form their own opinion of what is happening, letters and badges or not.
Sorry for the long story.... I was bored so I just kept typing
I don't call myself special agent, sgt, etc. I do NOT play cop unless I am in a police uniform and working with my dept. so please take my comments accordingly.
I have made many apprehensions and have NEVER had a problem with identification and have never had any "negative incidents" so I hope this will not affect any "possible work" by our company in the Mich area
Terry