|
FINALLY THE MASS SJC MADE A RULING CONCERNING 37 DIFFERENT CASES-ALL CASES WERE ABOUT BAIL ENFORCEMENT(THE RIGHT OF ARREST BY A BEA OR BONDSMEN OR THEIR AGENTS)IN THE PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF MASSACHUSETTS.
AS SOME OF YOU KNOW MULTIPLE BEAS HAVE BEEN ARRESTED AND CHARGED WITH KIDNAPPING, UNLAWFUL RESTRAINT , ASSAULT, AND OTHER CHARGES WHILE DOING BEA WORK-SOME HAVE BEEN FOUND GUILTY OTHERS HAVE PLEAD GUILTY SOME HAVE BEEN FOUND INNOCENT ALL WITHOUT A RULING BY SJC-NOW A CASE HAS BEEN HEARD BY THE SJC AND A RULING HAS BEEN MADE ON JANUARY 4 2005-IT WAS THE STATES POSITION THE BEA HAS BEEN MADE ILLEGAL BY LAWS ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE(BONDSMEN DID NOT HAVE RIGHT OF ARREST-COMMON LAW REMOVED AND REPLACED BY OTHER LAWS).
THE SJC RULING #09274 BASICLY SAYS THE STATES POSITION INCORRECT RIGHT OF ARREST BY BONDSMEN STILL APPLIES-THE DECISION RECOGINIZES TAYLOR V TAINTOR AND MANY OTHER RULINGS AS VALID AND UPHOLD RIGHT OF ARREST AND RIGHT TO USE FORCE NEEDED TO MAKE THAT ARREST(IT HOLDS US TO THE SAME STANDARDS AS POLICE OFFICERS) IF ANYBODY NEEDS A COPY EMAIL OR CALL ME AND I WILL EMIAL OR FAX IT TO YOU
|
