Fugitive Recovery Network (FRN) http://fugitiverecovery.com/forum/ | |
Wake Up N.J. ............. http://fugitiverecovery.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=9967 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Yak [ Wed 29 Apr 2009 15:34 ] |
Post subject: | Wake Up N.J. ............. |
Fighttp://www.northjersey.com/news/crim ... urt.htmlht for higher bail taken to high court Wednesday, April 29, 2009 Last updated: Wednesday April 29, 2009, 8:49 AM BY ELIZABETH LLORENTE Herald News STAFF WRITER 1 Comment People facing criminal charges along with deportation should face tougher bail terms, a Morris County prosecutor argued before the state Supreme Court on Tuesday. Deputy First Assistant Prosecutor Joseph Connor Jr. said those people pose a high flight risk, and could be deported — even of their own choice — without ever being tried in court. "We should be permitted to return to court to seek to have the bail adjusted accordingly," Connor said to the judges. Morris County Prosecutor Robert Bianchi turned to the state's highest court after Manuel Fajardo-Santos, an illegal immigrant from Honduras who was charged with sexual assault of a child last year, posted 10 percent of a $75,000 bail, was turned over to the federal government and came close to being deported without facing the charges. Michael Fletcher of the state's Public Defender's Office, Fajardo-Santos' attorney, maintains that there was nothing new in his client's case that justified raising or changing the terms of the bail. He has argued that from the outset it was known that his client was an immigrant who could be subject to deportation. Connor, however, argued that after ICE informed Morris County prosecutors that they were preparing to deport the Honduran man, then there were changed circumstances — a requirement for seeking altered bail terms. But Fletcher responded: "By waiting for him to post his bail [before seeking a higher one], they're preventing him from seeking what he is entitled to, to be released." Some civil rights activists have criticized Bianchi's quest for tougher bail terms for people who could face deportation on grounds it would create a two-tier bail system based on a person's immigration status. They say allowing such a system would be unconstitutional. Fajardo-Santos was charged with molesting a 9-year-old girl in Wharton last year. His bail was set at $75,000 but then raised to $300,000 by Superior Court Judge John Dangler after Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents lodged a detainer against him. An immigration detainer tags an immigrant for arrest by federal agents and subsequent deportation. Fajardo-Santos, who sits in Morris County Jail, had posted part of the $75,000 bail and was turned over to ICE, which had begun deportation proceedings. A state appellate judge reversed higher bail set by Dangler, and the Supreme Court put a hold on the matter pending Tuesday's hearing. People facing criminal charges along with deportation should face tougher bail terms, a Morris County prosecutor argued before the state Supreme Court on Tuesday. Deputy First Assistant Prosecutor Joseph Connor Jr. said those people pose a high flight risk, and could be deported — even of their own choice — without ever being tried in court. "We should be permitted to return to court to seek to have the bail adjusted accordingly," Connor said to the judges. Morris County Prosecutor Robert Bianchi turned to the state's highest court after Manuel Fajardo-Santos, an illegal immigrant from Honduras who was charged with sexual assault of a child last year, posted 10 percent of a $75,000 bail, was turned over to the federal government and came close to being deported without facing the charges. Michael Fletcher of the state's Public Defender's Office, Fajardo-Santos' attorney, maintains that there was nothing new in his client's case that justified raising or changing the terms of the bail. He has argued that from the outset it was known that his client was an immigrant who could be subject to deportation. Connor, however, argued that after ICE informed Morris County prosecutors that they were preparing to deport the Honduran man, then there were changed circumstances — a requirement for seeking altered bail terms. But Fletcher responded: "By waiting for him to post his bail [before seeking a higher one], they're preventing him from seeking what he is entitled to, to be released." Some civil rights activists have criticized Bianchi's quest for tougher bail terms for people who could face deportation on grounds it would create a two-tier bail system based on a person's immigration status. They say allowing such a system would be unconstitutional. Fajardo-Santos was charged with molesting a 9-year-old girl in Wharton last year. His bail was set at $75,000 but then raised to $300,000 by Superior Court Judge John Dangler after Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents lodged a detainer against him. An immigration detainer tags an immigrant for arrest by federal agents and subsequent deportation. Fajardo-Santos, who sits in Morris County Jail, had posted part of the $75,000 bail and was turned over to ICE, which had begun deportation proceedings. A state appellate judge reversed higher bail set by Dangler, and the Supreme Court put a hold on the matter pending Tuesday's hearing. What are these? |
Author: | speezack [ Thu 30 Apr 2009 06:41 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake Up N.J. ............. |
Quote: Some civil rights activists have criticized Bianchi's quest for tougher bail terms for people who could face deportation on grounds it would create a two-tier bail system based on a person's immigration status. They say allowing such a system would be unconstitutional. Well, duuuuuuuuuu a persons status, whether it be based on being an immigrant or the charge, or whatever is brought into the mix for a decision on whether or not to bond comes into play in every instance of bonding... why should this be any different. Main reason, but not the only reason, is "FLIGHT RISK"... and from the standpoint of the bonding company... I can think of no more important reason... a "two-tier" bail system??? Every bond is looked at in many different ways... the bondsman's decision to write the bond has to take "ALL" aspects of the defendant into consideration... and if the courts do the bond, it should be the same... certainly the fact that he/she may face deportation is of utmost importance. This is, IMHO, simply another opportunity for the illegals to play the RACE card once again and it has nothing to do with race, only liability for the bond. The CR activists should be as concerned about the victim's rights in this case. Quote: Fajardo-Santos, who sits in Morris County Jail, had posted part of the $75,000 bail As I understand it Yak, In NJ you can post bond either through the court at 10% or a bondsman; is that so? And if so, was the $7500 for the bond in this instance placed through the court and according to what is in the media report... he didn't pay all the premium??? Not sure I understand this... so the court will hold him and allow him to make payments until the premium is collected, is that the way it works?? Also, one other semi related note... I was just on a couple of websites in Jersey looking and reading and I see on several that bondsman there are big into financing premiums... as this excerpt from a website notes... "Many agencies will also work out payment plans with each client so that the client can afford bail. Some payment plans may include payment by credit card while others could have no-collateral down." I suppose that would be an incentive for the indemnitor to go with a bonding company rather than the courts since I would imagine the courts would not finance a bond (except that he remains in custody until paid in full)... although... the premium is refunded in full from the court after the charges are adjudicated... right? |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |