Fugitive Recovery Network (FRN)
http://fugitiverecovery.com/forum/

WARNING
http://fugitiverecovery.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=10615		 Page 1 of 2
Author:  Greywolf09 [ Fri 20 Nov 2009 13:08 ]
Post subject:  WARNING
WARNING TO ALL BAIL ENFORCEMENT AND FUGITIVE AGENTS :

I was contacted recently by a Denika Towson who wanted my
Agency to find her boyfriend.
An alleged felon that had ran to another state and took her child.

If you are contacted by this person DO NOT TAKE HER CASE.
I have found information that can put any of us in an illegal
situation.
Author:  4130 [ Fri 20 Nov 2009 13:25 ]
Post subject:  Re: WARNING
And that information would be what? If your going to issue a warning like this it would be appropriate to provide the reason we should not take her case.
Author:  Greywolf09 [ Fri 20 Nov 2009 15:16 ]
Post subject:  Re: WARNING
4130 wrote:
And that information would be what? If your going to issue a warning like this it would be appropriate to provide the reason we should not take her case.


All the information she has is a forgery.
She has numerous felony convictions:
Forgery, bad checks, attempting to obtain legal documents by illegal means, identity theft. These are just a few pieces of info that has
been documented.
Author:  KARMA [ Fri 20 Nov 2009 15:43 ]
Post subject:  Re: WARNING
Thanks. Hence the reason for not always answering "Hi, I am new and would like to know how to go about. . . . " questions
Author:  Greywolf09 [ Fri 20 Nov 2009 15:53 ]
Post subject:  Re: WARNING
Greywolf09 wrote:
4130 wrote:
And that information would be what? If your going to issue a warning like this it would be appropriate to provide the reason we should not take her case.


All the information she has is a forgery.
She has numerous felony convictions:
Forgery, bad checks, attempting to obtain legal documents by illegal means, identity theft. These are just a few pieces of info that has
been documented.


Just a note: Luvonda contacted me and posed a question.
How do i get past the no arrest law in Illinois?
When it comes to this state, i always do a early morning (2-3am)
snatch and grab. I am in and out before anyone knows what has
happened and have not had a problem yet.
Author:  BondgirlCA [ Fri 20 Nov 2009 16:53 ]
Post subject:  Re: WARNING
Ya know, I did a bad checks, forgery bond the other night...and your warning means what to me???
Author:  4130 [ Fri 20 Nov 2009 19:21 ]
Post subject:  Re: WARNING
A question related to the illinois no arrest laws. Why is it that we allow a state to have the authority to tell us we can't do bail recovery in their state when it's already been challenged in the highest court in the land? I realize it's cost prohibitive to challenge this on an individual level. It just seems that most just accept it as states rights. I am a big fan of states rights except when matters of constitutional or Common law authority over rule it. So my question is why is no one challenging these ridiculous laws?
Author:  RCrew [ Fri 20 Nov 2009 23:03 ]
Post subject:  Re: WARNING
Regarding your "snatch and grab"; that would be a violation of Illinois law. Thus a person doing so would be commiting a crime and that would make that person a liability to the bondsman. Also, because Illinois is a state that subscribes to the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act (UCEA), a person would have violated the state law regarding extradition (725 ILCS 225/).

Not trying to jerk anyone around, but it is imperative to complete our jobs through legal means to prevent becoming a liability.
Author:  Kathy [ Fri 20 Nov 2009 23:56 ]
Post subject:  Re: WARNING
4130, you are correct in that it would be nice if somebody had the money to fight the restrictive laws in the states that don't allow us to work there, along with the ridiculous weapons laws that many of the same states and others have. Many states like mine uphold T v T, but for those that do not, it would be a very expensive fight. It is the same with our second amendment rights. Even though the SC has upheld that right, it would still be an expensive battle with those states, and in getting it heard by the SC if all state/district appeals were lost. Unfortunately, federal laws rule as a whole, but state laws that meet or exceed federal laws are allowed unless they are deemed unconstitutional by the SC. Since a complete ban against weapons has been deemed unconstitutional by the SC, the states apply restrictions that still make it virtually impossible for a person to own or possess one.

Everything that has happened and is happening in our country is just another way that we are being deprived of the rights that our forefathers fought for and succeeded to give us. We are quickly slipping into a Socialistic government, and most of the people accept this because they don't understand the danger. They see the "comfort" promises that are made, think that they should be "taken care of" by the government, and don't understand the freedoms that they are giving up, or the cost that everyone will have to share. They have been led to believe that if a person has advanced themselves to a higher level, that the person then somehow owes those lower than themselves. They believe that they are "owed" the American dream, just by virtue of living here, legally or not, and should have to do nothing to earn it. These are the things that our government is using to gain support for themselves. I work for what I have, and I don't feel that I should have to support another, especially when I have trouble supporting myself.

Sorry to turn this into a political discussion, but I stand by what I say.
Author:  4130 [ Sat 21 Nov 2009 01:41 ]
Post subject:  Re: WARNING
I agree with every thing you just said Kathy. It's hard raising kids and trying to teach them about the values my generation did not even learn.

It seems to me that our country is in big trouble with cities over ruling states and scotus. There is not rule of law anymore. It's becoming more and more the rule of power. Which is I guess was the point of my question. Why do we allow them to have this power. I know it goes far beyond Fugitive recovery and even 2nd Amendment rights. I mean who would have ever thought "shall not be infringed" meant reasonable restrictions. :evil:
Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/