Joe Stiles wrote: If this article is truly about our Mr. Danbo, then I believe he has been a little misleading. He wrote in another thread that after twenty years he finally had to use his weapon. The defendant shot first and he shot last. In a discussion about legal terms for homicide, I believe he intended for us to infer that he had actually killed someone in the line of duty. After re-reading his post, I see that he did not explicitely say this, but I feel that it was implied.
As far as you having never heard of me or the other people on this forum? My guess is that you are either not as connected to the industry as you say or you haven't discovered how Google works yet. Either way, I'll be glad to stack my reputation against yours anyday.
One other thing, that 100% recovery rate on twelve hundred captures, approximately 150 of which were difficult felonies in twenty-two years? It comes out to about 1 every six days which is still pretty incredible consider all the private investigating, phone repair, navy assignments, and, lest I forget, fence painting that was going on during this time. I have never said this to a newbie before, but I am done with you. From now on, unless you specifically name me, I will ignore you.
Ummmm.. So to be a professional, I have to know ans associate with the likes of this crew. OMG... THAT'S WHAT I'VE BEEN MISSING
Here, I'll give you some more info too. I had a team of 5 people when working full time, so I guess I actually shouldn't take credit for all apprehensions even thought did the research on them all. Some of them my guys picked up for me.
Again, you guys are arguing my experience but not the facts of the conversation. You are all acting like liberals at election time. Avoid the question with re-direction.
No use I guess. I'll be getting off of this forum. I don't need association with the likes of this group. Stick together. You'll need someone to send you commissary money.
|
partner???